May Brotherly Love Prevail, and Every Moral and Social Virtue Cement Us

Every Mason will recognize the above declaration as the epilogue of the closing prayer given at almost every lodge meeting. It was penned by William Preston in 1772. 

It is an admonition for toleration.

Frederico Mayor, in an address dedicating the Beit-Hashoah Museum for Tolerance in Los Angeles in 1993 said; “…our ability to value each and every person is the ethical basis for peace, security and intercultural dialogue.” Albert Pike stated it even more poignantly in the tenth degree by declaring that without toleration “we are mere hollow images of true Masons, mere sounding brass and tinkling cymbals.” The fact is that a peaceful future depends on everyday acts of kindness and respect. It is a lesson every Freemason knows well. 

Among all the teachings Masonry imparts to its members, none is more important than championing the ideal of toleration in all things. In the book of lectures for the symbolic lodge, we read; “By the exercise of Brotherly Love we are taught to regard the whole human species as one family; the high and low, the rich and poor; who, as created by one Almighty Parent, and inhabitants of the same planet, are to aid, support and protect each other. On this principle, Masonry unites men of every country, sect and opinion, and conciliates true friendship among those who might otherwise have remained at a perpetual distance.”

The history of much of the world is a saga of deep ethnic divisions, regional conflicts, religious zealotry, and economic hostilities among peoples. Intolerance, jealousy and greed have fragmented almost every country in the world. There was a time when people came to America seeking asylum from such human suffering and strife. The altruistic nature of democracy has made the United States a multi-cultural society. Now the same divisions that have caused so much suffering and loss in the rest of the world are becoming manifest in the freest country on earth. We are becoming a nation filled with mistrust and animosity.

The natural reaction to diversity is to isolate ourselves in our own culture. It’s a kind of “out of sight, out of mind” mentality. It is easy to believe that we can’t get hurt if we stay within our own group. We can’t get into trouble if we don’t participate. But with people now migrating to America in record numbers, everyone who has perceived themselves as 20th century American-born citizens are rapidly becoming a minority. This perception is strong across every culture. National unity will never be possible if we feel threatened by every group outside our own. It’s time all of us made a little sacrifice and effort toward a greater cause.

Since (as the saying goes) you can’t teach an old dog new tricks, it seems the only chance we have of achieving and maintaining a sense of national unity at home is to develop a healthy learning environment among our children that will give them a full cross-cultural understanding. And such understanding will not just happen. To communicate and learn from one culture to another takes entire families out of their comfort zone. To achieve a reconciliation of idealistic, ethnic, religious and cultural differences between the old ways and the new will require an extraordinary feat of will and learning. In most cases, toleration itself will have to be learned and practiced.

But it is a role I believe was made for the Scottish Rite. If the Rite is indeed a great power, it is so because influence is power; and will is power. The teachings of the Rite answer these kinds of questions: What kind of society might we have if we were to achieve a culture of peace? How much would such a culture manifest itself in our family lives, communities, state and national politics and international relations? What relationship exists between tolerance and peace? Can human rights be realized without a social commitment to tolerance? Is there a significant relationship between human rights and democracy? What are our own personal and community concerns about the issue of tolerance? How do our concerns relate to tolerance on a global scale? How can we contribute to promoting a tolerant world?

If our own history is a guide, Freemasonry gains civic and social relevance when it stands up for what it stands for. There can be much value in sharing our values with the cross-cultural world in which we live. Perhaps it is a mission of the Scottish Rite to take the lead in diagnosing the kinds of intolerance which hinders the world; and then pledge, individually and corporately, to do whatever is necessary in educating the next generation of adults that tolerance is indeed the most reasonable means to peace in the world. 

It seems like such a worthy mission—to stand on what we stand for.

________________________________________

THANK YOU FOR READING THE LAUDABLE PURSUIT!

IF YOU ENJOYED THIS PIECE, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO SHARE IT ON SOCIAL MEDIA SITES AND WITH YOUR LODGE.

For more information on Wor. Robert G. Davis Please: CLICK HERE

Also, visit us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheLaudablePursuit

_______________________________________

SHOW YOUR SUPPORT
If you enjoyed this content, you can show your support by visiting the "Support TLP" page in the header.

Carpe Diem

I was watching a movie with my kids this weekend, the title of which is not relevant, and the following line struck me: “That wasn’t living, that was just not dying. There’s a difference!”. The words resonated with me and I found myself lying in bed that night thinking a bit about what it meant, and where it can be seen.

How many reading this blog can say that, regardless of how successful they are in the application of it, attempt to live each day to the fullest? How many seek to not only maintain, but to improve life for themselves and others? How many can say that they are working each and every day to make the most of not only today, but ensure that the future is bright as well? I would suggest that the answer to all three questions is “not enough”. Make no mistake, I am guilty of living according to the Tread Mill method on many days, perhaps sometimes even for weeks at a time. However, seeking to change that trend can only result in a positive. As this blog is primarily Masonic, I will focus this line of thinking in that context.

Stories abound of Lodges that exist only to open, read the minutes, pay the bills, and close quickly so that they can retire to the dining room to eat the same meal that they have had after every meeting since being chartered. These same Lodges are often filled with Past Masters who, with great passion, cry afoul when any type of change is proposed to the Lodge. “There is no INNOVATION in Masonry!”, they will cry. “We have done it this way for years with no problems!”, they proclaim. To this, I would suggest that the proposer ask the following questions. “Is this Lodge truly living its purpose in Masonry? Or is it simply not dying by maintaining the status quo?” Too many Lodges exist. Too few Lodges are living. Though many approaches can and should be taken to communicate this message to the Brethren, it is important that they be able to answer the question “Is this Lodge living its purpose in Masonry?” in the affirmative. Either they are seeking to improve themselves, their Brethren, and therefore society as a whole, or they are simply a drone in the hive of Masonry.

Harsh? Perhaps. Let me be clear. I am not advocating one approach to Masonry within the Lodge to another. I am claiming that Lodges should be “living” and not just simply “not dying”. If your Lodge experience is far from meaningful, then seek to change it! If your sole purpose for meeting is to read the minutes, pay the bills, and close the Lodge, then seek to make it about more. An attentive ear is hard pressed to make it through any conversation concerning the current state of the Craft without hearing about the dwindling membership. Normally it is followed by an explanation about competing priorities, internet, televised sports, work commitments, etc. prevent men from coming. To that I say the following. The problem is not that men are too occupied with work, smart phones, video games, family commitments or anything of the sort. The problem is that we are not offering them anything that can compete with those things. Now, aside from one’s family (which in my eyes is first priority regardless), there is nothing in that grouping that should be more enticing to a man that to be a part of something as sacred and as special as Masonry. To participate in timeless rituals, cloaked in secrecy, filled with allegory and symbolism, all seeking to instill ancient wisdom to the participant is something that should trump almost anything! Yet they do not come to the Lodge. Why is that?

The answer is simple. Too many Lodges are simply “not dying”. They are not “living” Masonry! They rush through the degrees as if they are simply a box to be checked. They encourage minimum proficiency because “men just do not have time for memorization and study”. They spend meetings bickering about bills, arguing over minutes, and closing quickly only to come back and do it all over again. This is not Masonry. When men come into Lodge, they want something special, something sacred. They do not leave (or fail to ever join) because they are not interested in Masonry. They leave (or fail to join) because they ARE interested in Masonry and have not found it in the Lodge.

Take notice, Brethren. Masonry is not a box to be checked. It is not something that you have to “get out of the way” so that you can drink coffee and eat off of paper plates in the dining room. It is not something that can be taught or experienced by utilizing minimum proficiencies. Masonry is a timeless system designed to impart wisdom and improve men and the societies in which they live. It is our duty to treat it as such. So with that, I will ask the following questions to the reader: “Is your Lodge living its purpose in Masonry? Or is it simply not dying?” If it is the latter, what are you going to do about it?

_________________________________________________________________________

Thank you for reading The Laudable Pursuit!

If you enjoyed this piece, please feel free to share it on social media sites and with your Lodge.

For more information on Wor. Jason Eddy, Please CLICK HERE:

Also, visit us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheLaudablePursuit

_________________________________________________________________________

SHOW YOUR SUPPORT
If you enjoyed the podcast, you can show your support by clicking the donate button below.

Of My Own Freewill and Accord

                                Hand Door Knocker- (C) Julius Eugen 2007

                                Hand Door Knocker- (C) Julius Eugen 2007

I’ve always been curious about the peculiar practice in Freemasonry that no man may be asked, invited, or solicited to enter the fraternity. It is an organizational feature almost unique among societies. In fact, organizations with the most select membership are those which receive no applications, but select and invite their candidates. The no-ask/no-tell canon has been a rule of immemorial standing in the fraternity and, yet, it is impossible to determine when it originated. There is nothing concerning it in the Gothic Constitutions, nor in any of the rules and by-laws of the old lodges, or in the Constitutions of 1723; nor is it discussed by any of the Masonic writers of the 18th Century. There is nothing in the ritual on the subject. The “candidate interrogatories” written by William Preston asks only that the candidate affirm he comes to Freemasonry unbiased by an improper solicitation. And yet, we know that men of noble rank were solicited to become Grand Masters, though they were not Freemasons and had to be initiated just for that purpose.

So, all this begs some questions--if we come to Freemasonry by our own free will and accord, in what way are we free? Masonically, what does it mean to be free men? Is this freedom important? Once we enter and take on the commitments and obligations of our fraternity, does this make us less free?

Perhaps there is something to be learned by reflecting on the meaning of being free men in the context that Freemasonry is a “system of morality veiled in allegory.” These three words, “system of morality” may be at the core of our understanding of being free-men, or free-masons. Certainly, these words would be a reason why we should insist that all men who join us do so with complete freedom. Freedom is a condition sine qua non for joining an order based on morality.

That a person enters of his own free will and accord means that he is a man free from all prejudices and attitudes which are not based on his own self examination; that he is prepared to judge all attitudes, including his own, with intellectual integrity; that he is free and ready to make a moral judgment and to defend it even when he is in the minority or under strain for holding such a view; and, even more important, that he is aware he must place limits on his own freedom if he is to insure other men the same right to theirs.

There is a thin line between being free and being just; between dividing one’s obligations with one's rights; in self-censoring our own freedom as a result of recognizing another has the same right to his own; that the moral norms of one country may be different in another, yet both right; that the majority recognize the minority’s point of view and that the minority accept the right of the majority to bind all by its decisions. One becomes morally free only when his individual independence is balanced by intelligent choice.

To be moral and to act in accordance with moral values requires the ability and readiness to judge between right and wrong, between what is in conformity with prevailing norms and what is not. A moral choice can only exist if it rests on choosing between two possible alternatives; and this choice has to be made with complete freedom and with no coercion of any kind. A man determines his sense of morals only when these are put to the test. If the choice he makes is made under coercion, there is no moral value in his choice.

To be a Freemason means we possess fundamental moral attitudes which are based on constant self evaluation and re-evaluation of every aspect of our life. The opening charge to the Master Mason in the 4° of the Scottish Rite is worthy of our contemplation. “Freemasonry is an institution seeking human happiness through tolerance and love; self-perfection, glorifying justice, truth and equality; fighting tyranny, ignorance and prejudices.”

To achieve this definition means that every Brother must approach free objectivity in his moral choices. We may think of freedom only in a sense of being free from restrictions or limitations. However, this is perhaps the lesser freedom. The freedom to act according to our freely-made moral choices and convictions is what makes us true Freemasons.

Are we less free as a result of undertaking such commitments together as Brothers? I think not. In fact, we have chosen of “our own free will and accord” to be committed to certain moral values.

To me, this is a true expression of being free.

________________________________________

Thank you for reading The Laudable Pursuit!

If you enjoyed this piece, please feel free to share it on social media sites and with your Lodge.

For more information on Wor. Robert G. Davis Please: CLICK HERE

Also, visit us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheLaudablePursuit

_______________________________________

SHOW YOUR SUPPORT
If you enjoyed this content, you can show your support by visiting the "Support TLP" page in the header.